The fights stay in the Picture
For whatever reason, whenever there is a holiday on a Monday, my Hockey News gets all messed up. As such, I got two issues on the same day last week. No, wait, three. Anyway, one of them was the debate on fighting, and where it has a place in the game of hockey. I read the issue with an open mind, and a willingness to listen to both sides of the argument, and I have come to a conclusion that fighting most certainly has a place in hockey, and I hope it still does for years to come.
Listen, I am sorry Don Sanderson died. From everything I have read about him, he sounded like a hell of a nice young man. Loyal to his friends and family almost to a fault. He wasn’t the best hockey player on earth, but he knew his role. I have to ask though, why is there a role of enforcer in a senior A league? Am I wrong, or is this a glorified title for men’s league? Don was not getting paid to be there, in fact quite the opposite; he paid his own way to games. It is essentially a weekend recreation league, and I have to agree with Wayne Gretzky on this. Why was he fighting in this league in the first place?
In the wake of this tragedy, there is a ground swell to ban fighting in hockey. It gives the media another chance to take shots at our beloved game by showing fights in which people get taken down and land on their head sans helmet. The beating Kevin Westgarth gave Garret Klotz was as ill timed as a fart in church. I’d like to use logic to help solve this issue if I may. Don Sanderson was killed in a fight in a league WHERE IT IS ILLEGAL TO FIGHT. This is not a league where you have a dust up, and go feel shame for 5 minutes. A fight in the OHA results in a game ejection, so really, what will a ban on fighting do? Not a thing. Instead, here are some ideas I have on the matter.
1. Remove visors for anyone with over 100 PIMS the previous season in the AHL. Part of the problem and dangerousness of fighting is the code of honor under which these guys operate. When a fight ensues in the AHL, a lot of the times the boys shed sticks, gloves, and now helmets. Why? They don’t want to shred their knuckles on their opponent’s visor. Plus, one shouldn’t be fighting with a shield on. It’s against the code, and in fact, there is an extra penalty given to any player that instigates a fight with a shield on, on top of the instigator penalty. My solution is to give players that have amassed over 100 PIM the previous season to sign a no visor waiver. With the guys doing the heavy lifting visor less, they are free to fight without having to remove the bucket.
2. Remove the instigator. I have said this so many times, I will now try in another language. El removeo el instigatoro. Part of the argument people are making against fighting is they like fights, but not the staged ones. Why are people fighting 2 seconds into a game they ask? Well, because there are scores to settle, and if there is no instigator, those scores can be settled in the heat of battle without having to resort to staged fights. Personally, I love a good opening faceoff donnybrook, but maybe that’s because I understand what is happening more than the average bear.
3. Assess an extra penalty for take downs. I score no points for takedown in a hockey fight, and it’s become more and more a part of the strategy as of late. Perhaps it has something to do with a lot of the tough guys doing MMA training in the off season. From what I understand, takedowns are a huge part of the strategy in MMA. Watch a fight from the 80’s or 90’s. More of those fights were 2 guys squared up throwing punches at one another. When they got tired, they grabbed onto each other, and the stripes came in and separated the exhausted combatants. Of course you can find fights to the contrary, but look at the fights today. Two guys drop mitts. They size each other up forever. Then they try and get in tight on one another. Body shots ensue, then the take down. They aren’t as interesting as they once were, and maybe if the takedown rule is implemented that might change. It would be kind of hard to enforce, and some takedowns would be questioned, but I think it’s worth a shot. Hell, the NHL did a ton to open up the game after the lockout, why not try to make fighting more exciting while we’re at it?
Once again, I am very sorry for the loss of Don Sanderson. It’s tragic and sad, but let’s not has a knee jerk reaction and ban fighting because of it. It’ doesn’t sound like something Don Sanderson would have wanted.